Since its inception 200 years ago, homeopathy has been treated as an
alternative to the usual conventional medicine and science has kept a
respectable distance from it since it does not seem to pose any harm. Its apparent
resurgence in these times has rekindled the discussion as to whether
homeopathic medications are an effective treatment against disease or whether
they are no more than an elaborate placebo. The discussion as to whether or not
it is an effective therapy is ongoing in human and veterinary medicine; it
appears to have devolved into one between proponents of homeopathy and those
who rely on firm evidence of effectiveness before adopting any therapy.
Since Food and Drug Administration has decided to conduct a two-day review
of regulations on homeopathy, science has stepped forward to take the place of
a jury. Experts are convinced that to be able to definitely know the effectiveness
of homeopathy, it should undergo clinical trials.
Homeopathy is a $6.4 billion business in the United States alone where
only 10% of its citizens are into this practice. How much more would it be in
Europe where the British royal family have publicly announced its support of homeopathy
and Germany have mandated all school curricula to include homeopathy in its
teaching? Same question goes to Asia where homeopathy is a mainstream in India
and experts are more on call in Jakarta, Indonesia and Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia than physicians are.
After decades of ignoring these products, drug regulators are finally
asking hard questions about what has long been derided by mainstream doctors
and scientists as quack medicine. Yet, a lot of homeopathic experts still believe
that the practice needs not to undergo medical testing as it already has
science behind it. Complaints of fraudulence are also
non-valid if people really want to find science explanation on its function.
According to the Peterson Group, one of the leading
sources of information on alternative, complementary and integrative medicines,
there is science in homeopathy. There is actually considerably more laboratory
and clinical research on homeopathic medicine than most people realize. It is
important to first note that its founder, Samuel Hahnemann was a physicist
himself.
One of the most famous studies is called Arndt-Schulz law which
explains that weak stimuli accelerate physiological activity, medium stimuli
inhibit physiological activity, and strong stimuli halt physiological activity.
To explain for instance, it is widely
recognized that normal medical doses of atropine block the parasympathetic nerves,
causing mucous membranes to dry up, while exceedingly small doses of atropine
cause increased secretions to mucous membranes.
No comments:
Post a Comment